Best Mobile Processor Ranking List 2019

The processor or the SOC is unarguably one of the most critical components of a mobile device. The performance of the processor directly correlates with the phone’s speed and user experience.

A smartphone with a fast processor will open all your favorite apps in a blink of an eye, and your tasks will be done in no time. But a phone with a weak processor will result in bad user experience and may cause issues such as overheating and lagging. The SOC also becomes the major of the phone if you’re into mobile gaming.

To test and rank processors, Tech Centurion has developed Centurion Mark which evaluates the performance of a processor.

Centurion Mark is a lot more than just raw benchmark. We also take the real-world performance into account while ranking the SOCs.

Centurion Mark not only considers the raw benchmarks but also takes real-world performance into account. This not only makes it highly accurate, but it makes it easy for consumers to understand a phone’s performance without going much into technical details.

As of October 2019, the best mobile processor is Apple A13 Bionic which powers the iPhone 11 Lineup. Among Android devices, the Snapdragon 855+ is currently the best processor followed by Kirin 990 5G, Snapdragon 855, Kirin 990 4G & Exynos 9825. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 is the 9th best chipset for Android devices after the Exynos 9820.

If you’re also looking for the ranking Desktop & Laptop CPUs from Intel & AMD, check out this article.

    Best Mobile Processor List

Here’s the list of Top 30 Smartphone Processors.

Top 30 Mobile Processors in October 2019

Here’s the table that has the ranking of all the processors alongside the Centurion Mark.

RankProcessor NamePhoneCenturion Mark
#1Apple A13 BioniciPhone 11 Pro Max152
#2Apple A12 BioniciPhone XS Max146
#3Snapdragon 855+Asus ROG Phone II145
#4Snapdragon 855OnePlus 7 Pro144
#5Kirin 990 5GHuawei Mate 30 Pro 5G144
#6Kirin 990 4GHuawei Mate 30 Pro 4G143
#7Exynos 9825Galaxy Note 10+142
#8Exynos 9820Samsung Galaxy S10140
#9Kirin 980Huawei Mate 20 Pro137
#10Apple A11 BioniciPhone X130
#11Snapdragon 845OnePlus 6T127
#12Exynos 9810Samsung Galaxy Note 9125
#13Snapdragon 730GOppo Reno 2124
#14Kirin 810Honor 9X124
#15Snapdragon 730Redmi K20123
#16Kirin 970Huawei Mate 10 Pro121
#17Helio G90TRedmi Note 8 Pro119
#18Apple A10 FusioniPhone 7 Plus118
#19Helio G90118*
#20Snapdragon 835Google Pixel 2 XL117
#21Exynos 8895Samsung Galaxy S8+114
#22Snapdragon 712Vivo Z5114
#23Snapdragon 710Xiaomi Mi 8 SE113
#24Snapdragon 675Redmi Note 7 Pro112
#25Snapdragon 670Oppo R17111
#26Helio P90OPPO Reno Z110
#27Helio X30Meizu Pro 7 Plus109
#28Apple A9iPhone 6S Plus109
#29Snapdragon 821OnePlus 3T108
#30Snapdragon 820LG G5107
#31Exynos 8890Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge106
#32Kirin 960Huawei Mate 9 Pro103
#33Exynos 9611Samsung Galaxy M30s103
#34Exynos 9610Samsung A50102
#35Helio P65Vivo S1102
#36Snapdragon 660Xiaomi Mi A2101
#37Exynos 9609Moto One Vision101
#38Snapdragon 665Redmi Note 8100
#39Helio P70 Realme U199
#40Helio P60Realme 198
#41Exynos 7885Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)98
#42Kirin 710Huawei Honor 8X98
#43Snapdragon 636Nokia X697
#44Exynos 7904Galaxy M2096
#45Snapdragon 632Meizu Note 892
#46Kirin 955Huawei Honor V889
#47Snapdragon 630Motorola Moto X488
#48Kirin 950Huawei Mate 888
#49Exynos 7872Meizu M6s87
#50Helio X27UMIDIGI Z Pro85
#51Exynos 7420Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge81
#52Helio P35Infinix Note 681
#53Snapdragon 810OnePlus 280
#54Helio P30Gionee M780
#55Helio X23 Lenovo K8 Note79
#56Helio P23OPPO F579
#57Helio X25Meizu Pro 677
#58Exynos 7880Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)77
#59Helio X20Sharp Z275
#60Helio P25 Gionee A1 Plus75
#61Snapdragon 653Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro74
#62Helio P20Sony Xperia XA174
#63Apple A8iPhone 6 Plus74
#64Snapdragon 626Motorola Moto Z2 Play72
#65Snapdragon 625Xiaomi Mi A171
#66Kirin 659Huawei Honor 7X71
#67Kirin 658Huawei P10 Lite71
#68Snapdragon 650Redmi Note 3 Pro70
#69Kirin 655Huawei Honor 6X70
#70Kirin 650Huawei Honor 5C70
#71Snapdragon 439Vivo Y9369
#72Helio P22 Xiaomi Redmi 669
#73Snapdragon 652Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro69
#74Snapdragon 450Motorola Moto G669
#75Snapdragon 808Nexus 5X68
#76Exynos 7870Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)67
#77Helio A22Xiaomi Redmi 6A66
#78Kirin 935Huawei Honor 766
#79Kirin 930Huawei P865
#80Apple A7iPhone 5s65
#81Snapdragon 429Nokia 3.265
#82Exynos 5433Samsung Galaxy Note 461
#83Helio P18Nokia 5.161
#84Helio P10 ZTE Nubia N159
#85Snapdragon 435Moto E5 Plus59
#86Helio X10HTC One E959
#87Exynos 7580Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)58
#88Snapdragon 430Xiaomi Redmi 3s57
#89Snapdragon 617Motorola Moto G4 Plus55
#90Exynos 7570Samsung Galaxy J5 Prime53
#91Snapdragon 616Huawei Honor 7i52
#92Snapdragon 615Lenovo Vibe P151
#93MT6750TOppo F351
#94Snapdragon 427Moto G6 Play50
#95MT6739HTC Desire 1250
#96Snapdragon 425Nokia 2.149
#97MT6738Alcatel A30 Fierce49
#98MT6753Lenovo K4 Note49
#99MT6752Lenovo K3 Note48
#100MT6750Oppo F1s48
#101Snapdragon 415Lenovo Vibe K547
#102Kirin 620Huawei P8 Lite47
#103Snapdragon 412BQ Aquaris X546
#104MT6737TSamsung Galaxy J2 Prime46
#105Snapdragon 410Xiaomi Redmi 245
#106MT6737Moto E4 Plus45
#107MT6735Meizu M242
#108MT6732Acer Liquid Jade Z41

*The performance of processors marked with a star is estimated based on their specification, and the knowledge gained during the testing of previous-gen processors. These scores may change once we have tested phones based on these SOCs.

How to make use of this data?

Processors having the same or a close score can be considered as equivalent or similar in performance. This data can help you to determine which processor from a particular brand (Qualcomm Snapdragon, Samsung Exynos, Huawei HiSilicon, MediaTek, and Apple) is equivalent or comparable to the other.

Above 120

The processors that scored above 110 is Centurion Mark deliver excellent performance in Gaming as well as Heavy usage. Selecting a phone with a processor from this category is highly recommended for the best user experience.

Between 90-120

High performance is General use as well as gaming. If you’re buying a mid-range phone, then you should target this range.

Between 65-90

In this range, performance is just average. But you’re unlikely to observe any lags or any other significant issues. But some older chips like Snapdragon 810 having poor thermal performance might also fall into this category. If you have a low budget, try to get a phone that fits in this category.

Between 55-65

The general performance of these chips is below average, but it is acceptable in the lower end phones. These can suffer from occasional lags as well as throttling issues.

Below 55

The performance of these chips is below par, and you should avoid them unless you’re buying an extremely cheap phone with a budget lower than $100.

    Snapdragon 855 vs A12 Bionic vs Kirin 980 vs Exynos 9820

I understand that a single-digit score doesn’t tell the whole story. Therefore, here’s a detailed ranking of the current generation flagship SOCs in different aspects.

CPU Performance
  1. Apple A12 Bionic
  2. Exynos 9820
  3. Snapdragon 855
  4. Kirin 980

In Single-Threaded CPU performance, A12 Bionic is far ahead of the rest of the chips. But in Multi-Core test, the performance of all the four CPUs is quite similar.

GPU Performance
  1. Apple A12 Bionic
  2. Snapdragon 855
  3. Exynos 9820
  4. Kirin 980

Apple’s A12 Bionic continues to dominate the GPU performance while Snapdragon 855 is not far behind. However, both Exynos 9820 and Kirin 980 are quite behind. Even with the GPU Turbo Mode, Huawei’s Kirin 980 has the worst Gaming Performance in this list.

AI Performance
  1. Snapdragon 855
  2. Apple A12 Bionic
  3. Kirin 980
  4. Exynos 9820

In AI-related computation, Snapdragon 855 takes the crown followed by A12 Bionic. Huawei has talked a lot about the Dual NPU of Kirin 980. But sadly, it isn’t as impressive as they say.

Fabrication Node
  1. Apple A12 Bionic, Snapdragon 855, Kirin 980 
  2. Exynos 9820

A12 Bionic, Snapdragon 855, and Kirin 980 are fabricated using TSMC’s 7nm FinFET Process. While Exynos 9820 is manufactured using Samsung’s 8nm Process. TSMC’s 7nm Process has higher transistor density as compared to Samsung’s 8nm Process as you can see in this article.

  1. Snapdragon 855
  2. Exynos 9820
  3. Kirin 980
  4. Apple A12 Bionic

The above rankings depend on Networking Technologies, Internet Speeds, and Features. Though none of the chips have an Integrated 5G Modem, an external 5G Modem can be added on SD855, Exynos 9820, and Kirin 980.

User Experience
  1. Apple A12 Bionic
  2. Snapdragon 855
  3. Kirin 980
  4. Exynos 9820

The day-to-day usage experience is great and pretty close for all the four SOCs.

    Centurion Mark and its Significance

We not only test the raw performance but also check whether it is as good as per its specification. When a processor suffers from throttling/overheating on extended usage or lags frequently during general use or gaming, we deduct its score. But when a processor performs better than expected, we make sure to give it higher points.

Adding the User Experience section is essential to remove the high dependency on the raw performance scores. The scores are unbiased, and we do not favour any particular brand or processor. We also do not accept sponsored reviews by a smartphone or semiconductor manufacturer.

Centurion Mark

By giving almost the equal weight to the Real-World Performance as the Raw score, Centurion Mark is one of the most accurate ways to judge the performance of a SOC. Here are some of the significant factors that influence the Centurion Mark.

Parameters that Influence Centurion Mark

There are more than 20 parameters on which we judge a processor’s performance. But the most significant ones are:

  • User Experience
  • Real-World Performance (Gaming, Social Media, Browsing, and general phone usage)
  • Raw CPU Performance
  • Raw GPU Performance
  • Features and Technologies

Things to Note

Processors made by Apple run on a completely different OS and Apple doesn’t reveal the full specification. There is no real way to determine whether an Apple Processor will perform the same when running another OS such as Android. There’s also a difference in APIs, Kernal, and Programming Language. Even though the raw performance of an Apple’s chip seems unbelievably good, the performance difference in real-world is not significant. Lastly, the sustained performance of Apple chips isn’t as good as Qualcomm chips.

That’s why the Centurion Mark of Apple Processors is determined in a slightly different way and there’s a possibility of an error between 0 to 5%. But still, it is worth noting that Apple Processors are top-notch and the A13 Bionic is the best mobile processor as of now.

Because we determine Centurion Mark based on over 20 different parameters, one SOC with a better CPU but a weaker GPU can have the same Centurion Mark as another SOC with a weaker CPU but a better GPU. Thus, make sure to look at our GPU Benchmarks to find out which SOC has a better Graphics Processor. You are also free to ask any questions in the comment section or message us on our social media pages.

Custom UIs or skins may also affect the user experience of a device. UIs such as Samsung Experience, MIUI, and EMUI may improve or degrade the experience when compared to Stock Android. We do not take this factor into consideration. You can always flash a Custom ROM to improve the experience.

These scores may change whenever we change our algorithm and benchmarking process.

    Best Processors in Each Price Segment

This list contains the best processors in each price segment. Depending on your budget, try to get a phone with one of the best processors available.


Best Flagship Processors List


High-End Processors


Top Mid-Range Processors


Best Budget Processors

    Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Which is the best chipset?
Answer: Apple A13 Bionic is currently the best Mobile Chipset and A12 Bionic is the second-fastest. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ comes next, and it is followed by Snapdragon 855, Kirin 990, and Exynos 9825. Next, we have the Exynos 9820 and HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipsets.

Question: Which is the best processor for smartphones?
Answer: For Apple iPhones, A13 Bionic is the best processor, and for Android smartphones, Snapdragon 855+ is the best processor. While both these Processors have exceptional gaming and Multi-Threaded Performance, the A13 Bionic leads in Single-Core Performance.

Question: What is the fastest smartphone?
Answer: iPhone 11 Pro Max is the fastest phone in the world. Among Android phones, the Asus ROG Phone II and OnePlus 7T Pro are the fastest.

Question: Which is better processor Kirin or snapdragon?
Answer: Processors from both Kirin and Snapdragon are excellent, but if we compare their top Processors, the Snapdragon 855+ outperforms Kirin 980 by a significant margin. The major performance difference is because most Snapdragon chips have a better GPU compared to that of Kirin.

Question: Which mobile processor is best in 2019?
Answer: The iPhone 11’s Apple A13 Bionic is the fastest processor in 2019. It is fabricated using TSMC’s 7nm+ EUV Technology and has made improvements in multiple dimensions.

Question: Which chipset is best MediaTek or snapdragon?
Answer: Most of the top Snapdragon processors outperform their MediaTek alternatives, and so does their flagship chipsets. The Snapdragon 855+ is miles better than MediaTek Helio G90T. A huge contributing factor to this difference is that Qualcomm’s Adreno GPUs are comparatively better than that of MediaTek Mali GPUs.

    Final Words

I hope this list helps anyone looking to purchase a new smartphone. I’ll constantly be updating the list of best mobile processors as new devices launch. If you have questions on why a particular SOC is better, feel free to ask in the comments. I’ll get back to you as early as possible.

How much priority should you give to Centurion Mark?

Centurion Mark covers three significant aspects of a phone: General Performance, User Experience, and Gaming. A general consumer should give a high priority to Centurion Mark, followed by the factor that matters the most to you (Camera/Battery/Features/Design/UI).

An in-depth review of a particular smartphone will always give a better idea than just benchmarks. So, you shouldn’t only consider the Centurion Mark to judge a phone. It’s not always about choosing a phone with the best mobile processor, but the one that fulfills all your requirements.

58 thoughts on “Best Mobile Processor Ranking List 2019”

  1. Nice info, sir. Well laid-out, excellent comparison chart and suggestions. I really appreciate it, as I think buying a midrange cpu like the A8star, with the Snapdragon 660 is all I am going to need, given that I so not game. I just want smooth performance, video play, and no lag after a year or two. I can get the A8star in Korea for almost free, with credit card agreement. The only negative is A8star has just 4gb of ram in Korea. Maybe I don’t need to spend for a top-tier phone, anymore. Your info has helped me see that.. Take care!

    • On the basis of the performance improvement over SD710 (100 MHz CPU Clock Speed boost and some other minor changes), we have estimated its score to be 114. Once, we test an SD712 smartphone, we will revise its score. It could even reach 115 if the performance improvement is higher than what we are expecting right now.

      • you can say that again
        but I heard SD712 GPU will up to 550mhz(SD710 was 500 mhz)
        if that is true. i think SD712 should be 115 point
        but if SD712 just CPU 2.2Ghz to 2.3Ghz
        and QC4 to QC4+
        than i think SD712 still be 114 point

        i think this ranking is 99% correct

        thank you

    • CPU Performance of Snapdragon 710 & Helio P90 could be similar due to the same Cortex-A75 Architecture underneath and having the same clock speeds. But Snapdragon 710 will gain an edge in extended performance and power efficiency due to 10nm Fabrication Process. The TSMC’s 12nm Node on which Helio P90 is fabricated is nowhere near to that of Samsung’s 10nm Node. You can read more about it here.
      It’s good to speculate but there are over 20 different parameters on which Centurion Mark is calculated. Some of those factors are calculated automatically by our algorithm and some are calculated manually. Sometimes good specification doesn’t translate into good real-world performance and some times it even exceeds our expectations.

      • compare the score for iphone SE with apple a9 with snapdragon 835 as iphone SE has a very low resolution display so what will be the score for cpu or gpu in IPHONE se plz reply sir

        • Snapdragon 835 will still have an edge over Apple’s A9 chip in overall performance. In Gaming and other GPU intensive tasks, the performance of both will be quite similar.

  2. Here is my questions (about snapdragon 845) =
    İs snapdragon 845 good for gaming?
    which popular game lag on snapdragon 845?
    is snapdragon 845 be high-end processor soon?
    Thank you!

    • Snapdragon 845 is one of the best SOC for Android devices in terms of gaming. The only better SOC is Snapdragon 855.
      Almost every major game can be played on Snapdragon 845 without lags. But one exception would be Fortnite but it has more to do with some optimization issues rather than the capabilities of the phone itself.
      Buying an SD845 based device for Gaming on your phone would be a great decision!

  3. Hi it’s me again! i have an few question about new processor
    Snapdragon 735 is coming soon if it came out will you update the list?
    And will it pass snapdragon 845?

    • I just had a look at the leaked specification and it seems better than Snapdragon 845 in overall performance and could score somewhere around 130. However, Snapdragon 845 is still likely to have a superior GPU.

  4. Excellent article! Keep up the great work!
    I have one question though
    # Centurion Mark and its Significance
    When a processor suffers from throttling/overheating on extended usage or lags frequently during general use or gaming, we deduct its score.
    – That sounds fair if all SoCs are tested under the same hood. But mobile design / environment might affect the device overall heating – are those considering during testing?

    • Yes, mobile design can definitely affect heating. We only deduct scores only when a SOC shows signs of overheating in multiple phones. You can consider the Snapdragon 810 as an example. Almost every single SD810 device suffered from the same issue and that is why it is far below its expected score.
      Such issues were more common a couple of years back but now thanks to the 14nm/10nm/7nm FinFET Nodes, most of the new SOCs don’t suffer from overheating.

    • Samsung has provided no information on the Exynos 7884 SOC and I don’t have the Samsung Galaxy A20 either. By going through some of the online benchmarks, it seems that Snapdragon 632 has a slight edge over the Exynos 7884.

      • Sir, im going to get a new smartphone, can you give me an advice : – should i buy Galaxy S10 Plus 12Gb Ram 1TB Rom Exynos chip version or Iphone 8Plus256gb ? (i love Snapdragon855 but live in Vietnam i cannot get it, and i use for work and Pubg mobile).
        – Or i should wait and try to get 855SD chip version later? Cuz i hear about galaxys10plus Exynos chip are really really bad on gaming and Pubgmobile (i saw many reviews in Youtube told its bad. And – According to you sir, is it bad for gaming and worse vs SD855 version?). Thanks for reading my confuse bad English

        • The Exynos variant isn’t actually bad for gaming but if compared to the Snapdragon 855, its GPU is not that great. You can check in our GPU rankings that Adreno 640 is superior to Mali-G76 MP12. Both the iPhone 8 Plus and S10 Plus (SD855 Variant) will be an excellent choice for gaming but I’ll prefer S10 Plus because of the better display.
          Have you checked out the OnePlus 7 Pro? It is also a great device for gaming.

      • Taiwan has galaxy A20

        exynos 7884
        CPU 2*1.6+6*1.35
        GPU mail G51

        on CPU exynos 7884 draw with P22
        but GPU could kick out P22

  5. Hi sir, may I know why kirin 970 is ranked better than exynos 8895. Is it because of the neural processing unit?

    Huawei has launched kirin 810. Could you rank it in the list? Pls reply. Thanks!

    • The raw CPU performance of both the SOCs is comparable but Kirin 970 has a better GPU, Neural Processing Unit, Quad-Channel Memory Support, Dual VoLTE support, and some other features.
      Yes, I’ll soon be updating the list with Kirin 810 and other new SOCs.

  6. If the same SOC perform different scores on different OEM product, How do you evaluate the final score and products?

    • In most of the cases, the performance of SOCs on different OEM products is quite similar so we simply take the average of all the scores. We have plans to make a ranking system of smartphones in the future as sometimes OEMs use underclocked SOCs and some phones don’t perform as well as they are expected to.

  7. Why do Snapdragon 730 and 730g is better than kirin 810, kirin 970 in centurian marking ?
    I also want to know which one (from given above) has better GPU performance ? The GPU marking is not updated yet. Please Reply.

    • Snapdragon 730 & 730G use Kryo 470 Cores which are based on ARM’s Cortex-A76 Cores which are superior to Cortex-A73 cores in Kirin 970. SD730 & 730G have better power efficiency due to Samsung’s 8nm Node compared to TSMC’s 10nm Node in Kirin 970.
      Kirin 810 is on par (and slightly better in some scenarios) with Snapdragon 730 on both CPU & GPU performance and it is better in power efficiency. It seems like we have made an error during calculating its score and we will be updating the results soon.

  8. Why is helio a22 so much ahead of sd425 ? Is it because of GPU and fabrication. I use redmi 6a and it has heating issues while gaming and video playing in high quality for few hours. Plus general day to day performance of sd425 in redmi 5a seems better than 6a even with same UI and same configuration.
    Can you explain why it happens even if mediatek claims its cpu performance is 30% more.

    • I haven’t tested the Redmi 6A but I’ve heard that it is not as smooth as the Redmi 5A. Software level Optimization could be a factor in that as some other Helio A22 devices have a decent performance. Firstly, Snapdragon 425 is based on an older 28nm Fabrication Process which makes it less efficient. Both the chips have 4 Cortex-A53 cores but in A22, they’re clocked at 2 GHz compared to 1.4 GHz of Snapdragon 425. Because the IPC of the chips is similar (due to same Cortex-A53 design), the 35% increase in clock speed will result in similar performance increase. That is why MediaTek is claiming the performance to be 30% or more but in real-world, the difference won’t be as noticeable as using a different CPU Core like Cortex-A73.
      Heating issues could arise due to various different reasons. Two of the most prominent factors will be the higher clock speeds and poor heat dissipation.
      In our tests, Helio A22 was ahead of Snapdragon 425 in almost every test including the CPU & GPU Performance and that is why it is placed much higher.

      • Could you please let me know which phones have been taken into consideration for centurion mark calculation. As most of the helio a22 phones are in sub 10000 segment and Nokia 2.2 3gb variant with Android one to offers very poor performance.
        So i don’t think it could be software side since Google made stock Android to offer simplicity and speed to users so it is probably the optimised ui any hardware can work with.
        If even in such case it underperforms then it’s hardware fault.

  9. Hi !
    Also i wanted to know why sd 439 and 450 have same points when Qualcomm promises 20-25% increase in performance due to higher clocking speed in 429 and 439 against 425 and 450 respectively.( If 429 is 16 marks ahead of 425)
    Thanks in advance
    And i greatly appreciate your sincere hard-work in helping us consumers.

    • Snapdragon 439 and 450 have a very similar specification. While Snapdragon 439 is slightly ahead due to higher clock speeds (1.95 GHz vs 1.8 GHz), it is slightly weaker in GPU Performance (Adreno 505 vs 506). Snapdragon 450 also has a slightly better Modem & DSP but is it lacks some features like the latest Bluetooth 5.0 support. SD 450 is fabricated using Samsung’s 14nm Process while SD 439 using TSMC’s 12nm Process and both these nodes are comparable. You can check more about it on my article here.
      When we combine all these factors alongside many other tests, our score comes out to be the same.

      Snapdragon 429 is ahead of 425 due to various factors like the massive increase in clock speed (1.95 GHz vs 1.4 GHz), better GPU (Adreno 504 vs 308), fabrication node (12nm FinFET vs 28nm LP), and support for Quick Charge 3.0 Bluetooth 5.

  10. I saw speed test of 5a vs 6a in which they compare app and game opening speeds and ram management (of ui) to check which phone performs better in day to day usage . In which both had miui so the software factor cancels out and both were 2gb ram variants
    So this factor also cancels out. But the speed test clearly showed 425 as the winner and in not just one but probably all the cases.
    And since miui has very poor ram management just more than 4 lite apps and it reloads them and with its sluggish speed it is quite irritating. So this app opening speed and time difference becomes quite crucial in this case.
    Also my father has vivo y53 so i myself have witnessed the performance difference especially when switching between resource hungry apps such as Chrome.

      • Are you talking about the ones that do speed tests on the phone by opening the apps?
        If that’s the case, then sure, go ahead. But such tests give a better idea about the smoothness of the device rather than the processing power of the CPU. A fast Storage (such as UFS 3.0) will load data to RAM quicker and will result in a faster opening of apps. There are also other factors such as Animations that impact these tests and hence the results may vary with devices having different UIs.

  11. Hello is mi9 good phone for gaming? Someone said mi9 is overheating even when not playing game is that true if is it was it can able to solved by update?

    • Yes, Mi 9 should deliver excellent gaming performance as per its specifications. I haven’t used that device myself so I cannot comment about the heating issues. Did you read or watch any reviews? Someone who has reviewed this device would be able to answer your query better.

Leave a Comment

Pin It on Pinterest